
Many Friends will know me from my active involvement in the
Quaker world. I've been dubbed the "Quaker Blogfather" for my
Quaker Ranter (
site) blog and my work in pulling together
QuakerQuaker (
site), an online magazine and blogging community with over five hundred members and 10,000 visitors a month. I am also a frequent
Quaker workshop leader and
published writer.
I started
building websites in 1995 with an award-winning
Nonviolence.org hub site and was a social media pioneer when I redesigned its
homepage to a blog format three years later. Before going independent as MartinKelley.com in 2006, I served on the staff of
Friends General Conference (
site) for eight years, where I worked in the
FGC Quaker bookstore and built the
Quakerfinder,
FGC Gathering and
youth ministry sites. I also worked for
Friends Journal (
site) for two years, putting select articles from their
Quaker magazine online every month. Since then I've been privileged to work with
Quaker organizations such as
Friends World Committee for Consultation (
site),
Friends Council on Education (
site) and
Haverford Friends Meeting (
site). I've done some exciting media work with the
Philadelphia Penn Charter School (
site) and built personal sites for well known Friends. I bring our testimony of integrity to every business transaction and when I address topics such as
search engine optimization or
pricing philosophy, I try to do so from a Friends perspective.
Web Design Specialties:
adwords,
aggregators,
analytics,
blog,
blogging,
budget,
church,
consultant,
content,
content
management system,
css,
delicious,
design,
direct mail,
dreamweaver,
drupal,
education,
email,
facebook,
firefox,
flash,
flickr,
friends,
google,
google maps,
hebrew,
hittail,
javascript,
movable type,
music,
nonviolence,
paypal,
personal blog,
photo sharing,
quaker,
school,
seo,
small business,
south jersey,
video,
web,
wikipedia,
wordpress,
yahoo,
youtube.
Beth Kantor's nonprofit blog has an good article asking about the possibilities for real-time web interaction and asks whether it's possible for the web to let someone be in two places at the same time:
For me, the eye-opening moment of real-time collaboration came last winter when I was planning a conference with two friends. The three of us knew each other pretty well and we had all met each other one-on-one but we had never been in the same room together (this wouldn't happen until the first evening of the conference we were co-leading!). A month to go we scheduled a conference call to hash out details.
I got on Skype from my New Jersey home and called Robin on her Bay Area landline and Wess on his cellphone in Los Angeles. The mixed telephony was fun enough, but the amazing part came when we brought our computers into the conversation. Within minutes we had opened up a shared Google Doc file and started cutting and pasting agenda items. Someone made a reference to a video, found it on Youtube and sent it to the other two by Twitter. Wess had a secondary wiki going, we were bookmarking resources on Delicious and sending links by instant messenger.
This is qualitatively different from the two-places-at-once scenario that Beth Kantor was imagining because we were using real-time web tools to be more present with one another. Our attention was more focused on the work at hand.
I'm more skeptical about nonprofits engaging in the live tweeting phenomenon--fast-pace, real-time updates on Twitter and other "micro-blogging" services. These tend to be so much useless noise. How useful can we be if our attention is so divided?
Last week a nonprofit I follow used Twitter to cover a press conference. I'm sorry to say that the flood of tweets amounted to a lot of useless trivia. So what that the politician you invited actually showed up in the room? That he actually walked to the podium? That he actually started talking? That he ticked through your talking points? These are all things we knew would happen when the press conference was announced. There was no NEWs in this and no take-away that could get me more involved.
What would have been useful were links to background issues, a five-things-you-do list, and a five minute wrap-up video released within an hour of the event's end. They could have been coordinated in such a way to ramp up the real time buzz: if they had posted an Twitter update every half hour or so w/one selected highlight and a link to a live Ustream.tv link I probably would have checked it out. The difference is that I would have chosen to have my workday interrupted by all of this extra activity. In the online economy, attention is the currency and any unusual activity is a kind of mugging.
When I talk to clients, I invariably tell that "social media" is inherently social, which is to say that it's about people communicating. The excitement we bring to our everyday communication and the judgment we show in shaping the message is much more important than the Web 2.0 tool de jour.